DTN.ORG Home DTN.ORG User's Guide Search DTN.ORG Complete Database Contact DTN.ORG Officials Moonbat Central




Amnesty International’s Gulag Confusion
By Alex Svetlicinii
May 2006

Amnesty International: Not a Reliable Source
By Steven Plaut
June 2, 2003

The Human-Rights Lobby Meets Terrorism
By Adrian Karatnycky and Arch Puddington
March 2002

Amnesty and Human Rights Issues in the Arab-Israeli Conflict
By NGO Monitor
February 27, 2003

Review of Amnesty International in 2007: Attacking Democracy instead of Oppression in Middle East
By NGO Monitor
May 27, 2008

Amnesty's "Human Rights Meltdown"
By Sarah Mandel
December 20, 2007

Amnesty International Report for 2006
By NGO Monitor
May 21, 2007

Terror’s Faithful Allies
By Alan M. Dershowitz
September 1, 2006

Amnesty’s Humanitarian Pogrom
By Israel National News
June 4, 2012

Amnesty International Is Losing Its Way
By Gerald Steinberg and Jason Edelstein
June 14, 2011

Amnesty International Comes out of the Closet: Endorses "Defensive" Jihad
By Andrew McCarthy
April 3, 2010

Amnesty International Boss Endorses "Jihad in Self-Defense"
By The Investigative Project on Terrorism
April 2, 2010

Betrayed by Silence: NGOs Ignore Gilad Shalit´s Rights
By NGO Monitor
March 26, 2009

Amnesty's Gaza "Report" and Call for Arms Embargo: Abolishing Israel's Right to Self Defense
By NGO Monitor
February 25, 2009

Responding to Amnesty International - Resources
By HonestReporting.com
February 19, 2009

EU and NIF-funded NGOs Lead Condemnations in Gaza Conflict
By NGO Monitor
December 31, 2008

Human Rights Activists Have a Checklist for Obama
By Susan Jones
November 5, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
October 7, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
September 3, 2008

HRW, Amnesty, and the Reuters Cameraman Incident
By NGO Monitor
August 19, 2008

Amnesty on Gaza (again): Ideology Instead of Research
By NGO Monitor
August 14, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
August 7, 2008

Promoting the Al Dura Myth: The Role of Amnesty and HRW
By NGO Monitor
July 28, 2008

Amnesty International Tours Gitmo Cell as Proof of US Torture
By Penny Starr and Alison Aldrich
June 26, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
July 3, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
June 5, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
May 7, 2008

Amnesty International Calls Sentences against Muslim Brothers a 'Perversion of Justice'
By NGO Monitor
April 15, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
April 10, 2008

It's Time the 'Human Rights' Bodies Did Their Job
By Dan Kosky
March 30, 2008

The Care and Feeding of an Angry Territory
By Jonah Goldberg
March 7, 2008

What the NGOs Did Not Say This Month
By NGO Monitor
March 6, 2008

NGO Rhetoric on Gaza Conflict Undermines Human Rights
By NGO Monitor
March 3, 2008

False Claims of "Collective Punishment" in NGO Campaigns on Gaza
By NGO Monitor
February 28, 2008

NGO Gaza Campaign as Prelude to the 2009 Durban Review Conference
By NGO Monitor
February 3, 2008

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
January 3, 2008

Response to Dan Izenberg's Interview with Donatella Rovera, Amnesty International's Chief Researcher for the Arab-Israeli Conflict Zone
By Sarah Mandel
December 18, 2007

Finding Amnesty at Ha'aretz
December 12, 2007

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
December 4, 2007

NGO Bias in Pre-Annapolis Political Statements on Gaza
By NGO Monitor
November 26, 2007

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
November 5, 2007

Group Condemns 'Horrendous Acts of Cowardice' by Palestinian Factions
By Julie Stahl
October 24, 2007

Human Rights Group Demands Action on Palestinian Refugees
By Susan Jones
October 17, 2007

HRW, Amnesty and other NGOs Ignored Burma
By Gerald Steinberg
October 2, 2007

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
October 1, 2007

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
September 2, 2007

Amnesty International Becomes a Pro-Choice Organization
By NewsMax.com
August 21, 2007

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
August 1, 2007

Inhumane “Human Rights”
By Kathryn Jean Lopez
July 26, 2007

Last Summer's War Criminals Must Be Punished
By Ynetnews
July 12, 2007

Catholics Ask Amnesty International to Revoke Abortion Stance
By Monisha Bansal
July 9, 2007

Abortion International
By Ryan T. Anderson
July 7, 2007

Amnesty International's Inhumane Human-Rights Policy
By Kathryn Jean Lopez
July 2, 2007

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
July 2, 2007

Amnesty Int'l Defends Abortion Stance After Vatican Speaks Out
By Monisha Bansal
June 19, 2007

Double Standards: HRW/Amnesty/Christian Aid Statements on the Conflict between Fatah-al-Islam and the Lebanese Army
By NGO Monitor
June 12, 2007

"EU-Funded NGOs Lead Anti-Israel Events on Anniversary of 1967 War"
By NGO Monitor
June 5, 2007

NGO News in Brief
By NGO Monitor
May 30, 2007

NGO Monitor's Analysis of Amnesty International's 2006 Reporting on the Middle East Receives Extensive Media Coverage
By NGO Monitor
May 30, 2007

Amnesty International’s Credibility Challenged: “Biased Against Democratic Governments Relative to the Guerrillas”
By Daya Gamage
May 26, 2007

"Scrutinize Amnesty International"
By Gerald Steinberg
May 24, 2007

Amnesty Guilty Of Disproportionate Attention On Israel, Says Watchdog
By Ryan R. Jones
May 24, 2007

'Amnesty International Biased'
By Yaakov Lappin
May 20, 2007

World Bank Report on Palestinians Based on False NGO Reports and Anti-Israel Bias
By NGO Monitor
May 16, 2007

NGO Activity in Brief
By NGO Monitor
April 18, 2007

War on Terror Is Now War on Human Rights, Says Group
By Monisha Bansal
April 9, 2007

Human Rights Advocates Agree on Principles, Dispute Specifics
By Mike O'Sullivan
March 21, 2007

NGO Activity in Brief
By NGO Monitor
February 19, 2007

Amnesty International Secretary General Blogs Her One-Sided View of Israel-Palestinian Conflict
By NGO Monitor
January 22, 2007

Windsurfing to Guantanamo
By Cliff May
January 18, 2007

Activists Press for Closure of Guantanamo Bay Detention Center
By Susan Jones
January 10, 2007

Amnesty and HRW Claims Discredited in Detailed Report
By NGO Monitor
December 28, 2006

Misleading Claims by Amnesty and HRW Discredited by New Report Documenting Hezbollah War Crimes
By NGO Monitor
December 21, 2006

NGO Activity in Brief
By NGO Monitor
December 21, 2006

Estonia Is Right and Amnesty Is Wrong
By Economist.com
December 14, 2006

There Couldn't Be a More Perfect Time
By Gerald M. Steinberg
December 10, 2006

International Human Rights Day 2006 - NGO Complicity in Exploiting Human Rights Norms
By NGO Monitor
December 7, 2006

NGO Statements on Gaza Reflect Ideological Positions
By NGO Monitor
November 27, 2006

Stay Neutral on Abortion, Congressmen Tell Amnesty Int'l
By Nathan Burchfiel
November 21, 2006

NGO Activity in Brief
By NGO Monitor
November 9, 2006

Human Rights NGOs Neglect Hamas' Use of Human Shields
By NGO Monitor
November 9, 2006

Human-Rights Falsehood
By Gerald M. Steinberg
October 23, 2006

International NGO Activity
By NGO Monitor
October 18, 2006

4 Israel Firms in Top 100 Arms Producers
By Jonny Paul
October 8, 2006

Amnesty's Dirty Little Secret
By Charles Jacobs
September 19, 2006

Aftermath of Lebanon War and NGO Activity
By NGO Monitor
September 17, 2006

Other NGO Activity in Brief
By NGO Monitor
September 17, 2006

Amnesty Continues to Distort Human Rights Rhetoric to Attack Israeli Actions in Lebanon
By NGO Monitor
September 4, 2006

Why Are the Tamil Tigers Exempted from War Crimes?
By Ravi Randeniya
September 2006

'Human Rights' Report Blasts Israel, Barely Mentions Hizballah
By Julie Stahl
August 23, 2006

NGOs in the Lebanon War - Update 3
By NGO Monitor
August 9, 2006

The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD)
By NGO Monitor
August 2, 2006

The NGO Network and the UN Human Rights Council - "Business as Usual"
By NGO Monitor
July 17, 2006

Knowing the Enemy
By Mona Charen
July 14, 2006

NGOs Quick to Exploit Lebanon Crisis to Attack Israel
By NGO Monitor
July 13, 2006

NGOs' Political Biases Reflected in Reports on Gaza Violence
By NGO Monitor
July 6, 2006

Human Rights Hypocrites Won't Criticize Terrorists
By Clifford D. May
June 30, 2006

NGOs Denounce Israel for Gaza Beach Explosion Without All the Facts
By NGO Monitor
June 21, 2006

International NGO Activity - Amnesty International
By NGO Monitor
June 21, 2006

International NGO Activity - Oxfam and Amnesty International
By NGO Monitor
June 21, 2006

Human Rights Groups Silent on Death of Americans
By Jeff Emanuel
June 21, 2006

NGOs, It's Time to Stop Blaming Others
By Gerald Steinberg and Alex Margolin
June 18, 2006

Major NGOs Skip 'Unfair' Monitoring Conference
By Yoav Appel
June 14, 2006

Human Rights Groups Accused of Undermining Capitalism
By Sherrie Gossett
November 16, 2005

An American Gulag?
By Kenneth Anderson
June 13, 2005

NGOs Condemn Court Ruling on "Citizenship and Entry to Israel Law"
By NGO Monitor
June 12, 2006

Amnesty's 'Gulag' Nonsense
By Matthew Vadum
May 26, 2006

Pro-Lifers Galvanized by 'Right to Abortion' Move
By Patrick Goodenough
May 18, 2006

Amnesty International's Extremely Disproportionate Focus on Israel and the U.S.
By NGO Monitor
May 16, 2006

Political Activities of Israeli and Palestinian NGOs
By NGO Monitor
May 16, 2006

NGOs at the UN and EU
By NGO Monitor
May 16, 2006

NGOs Call for Continued International Funding of PA
By NGO Monitor
April 27, 2006

"Human Rights' Groups Such as Amnesty International Are Part of the Problem, Not the Solution"
By Israel Kasnett
April 25, 2006

Amnesty International Continues to Ignore Facts in Condemnation of Israel
By NGO Monitor
April 2006

Marching for Women's Lives
By Kathryn Lopez
February 28, 2006

Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International
By NGO Monitor
February 26, 2006

Ugly Iceberg of Bigotry
By Alan M. Dershowitz
October 12, 2005

Scapegoat to the World
By Alan M. Dershowitz
September 17, 2005

Amnesty: For North Korea
By Patrick Devenny
June 22, 2005

Did Amnesty International Call for Kidnapping of American Leaders?
By FrontPageMagazine.com
June 10, 2005

Amnesty and al Qaeda
By Wall Street Journal
June 7, 2005

Amnesty International's Tortured Comparison
By Dennis Prager
June 7, 2005

Amnesty's 2004 Annual Report: Too Much Politics, Not Enough Credibility
By NGO Monitor
June 6, 2005

Amnesty’s Absurdity
By Anne Bayefsky
June 6, 2005

From Interview with Natan Sharansky Concerning AI
By Time Magazine
June 6, 2005

Without Amnesty: Amnesty International Ignored This Testimony from Inside the Real Gulags
By Gordon Cucullu
June 3, 2005

Amnesty International - Do Your Homework
By Michael Ehrlich
June 2, 2005

General Slams Amnesty Report
By Audrey Hudson
May 30, 2005

We Are Not Paranoid
By David J. Forman
May 29, 2005

Amnesty Gets Bushwhacked
By Tony Parkinson
May 27, 2005

Amnesty's 'Gulag'
By Wall St. Journal Editorial
May 26, 2005

American Gulag
By The Washington Post
May 26, 2005

Amnesty International Exploits "Women's Rights"
By NGO Monitor
April 20, 2005

HRW and Amnesty Promote Caterpillar Boycott
By NGO Monitor
April 13, 2005

NGOs Issue One-Sided Condemnations of Gaza Operation Against Missile Attacks
By NGO Monitor
October 15, 2004

To Profile, or Not to Profile?
By Daniel Pipes
September 21, 2004

Correspondence with Amnesty International
By NGO Monitor
September 15, 2004

Amnesty International and Christian Aid: Restoring a Human Rights Agenda?
By NGO Monitor
September 15, 2004

Human Rights NGOs and the Neglect of Sudan
By Don Habibi
July 2, 2004

Amnesty International Update: 2004 Annual Report
By NGO Monitor
June 11, 2004

Selective Use of International Law
By NGO Monitor
May 27, 2004

Israel’s Disengagement Plan: NGOs Rush to Reject Gaza Withdrawal
By NGO Monitor
May 15, 2004

One-Sided Condemnation of Assassination of Hamas Leader Sheikh Yassin
By NGO Monitor
March 31, 2004

Abuse of Palestinian Children
By NGO Monitor
March 31, 2004

Amnesty’s Latest Report Grossly Unbalanced
By NGO Monitor
September 11, 2003

NGOs Condemn Israel for Citizenship Rules
By Gerald M. Steinberg
August 20, 2003

Amnesty International Report of 2003
By Danielle Hunter
June 24, 2003

"Human Rights" Organizations Join in Distorting Israeli Policy: A Critical Analysis
By NGO Monitor
June 23, 2003

Amnesty International's War on America
By Christopher Archangelli
June 5, 2003

Amnesty for Iraq
By Christopher Archangelli
April 24, 2003

Where Are the Human Rights Groups?
By Richard Pollock
April 15, 2003

Amnesty Calls for Washington to Review U.S. Arms Transfers to Israel
By NGO Monitor
March 31, 2003

Amnesty International Travesty
By Heather MacDonald
April 26, 2002


Click here to view a sample Profile.

5 Penn Plaza - 14th Floor
New York, NY

Phone :(212) 807-8400
Email :
URL: Website
Amnesty International (AI)'s Visual Map

  • Aims a disproportionate share of its criticism for human rights violations at the United States and Israel
  • Opposed American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq
  • Accuses the U.S. and Israel of war crimes

Amnesty International was founded by the British lawyer and activist Peter Benenson. In March 1961 Benenson, moved by a newspaper report of two Portuguese students incarcerated for criticizing the regime of their nation's dictator Antonio Salazar, published in a London newspaper an editorial titled “The Forgotten Prisoners.” In it, Benenson urged readers to join his “Appeal for Amnesty in 1961” campaign to aid political dissidents and prisoners of conscience worldwide. As part of the campaign, groups were organized in several countries, including the United States. At a 1962 conference in Belgium, these groups formally joined as one organization, Amnesty International (AI). 

Since the time of its founding, AI has presented itself as an ideologically disinterested and apolitical organization. AI maintains that it “does not support or oppose any government or political system, nor does it support or oppose the views of the victims whose rights it seeks to protect. It is concerned solely with the impartial protection of human rights.”

During the Cold War, however, AI focused scant attention on the human rights abuses committed by the Soviet Union and its satellites via the Warsaw Pact. Only in 1975, fully 13 years after its formation, did the organization finally release a report -- “Prisoners of Conscience in the USSR” -- documenting the plight of political prisoners behind the Iron Curtain. In its own defense, AI maintained that its work was complicated by the lack of access to prisoners in the Communist world, and by the possibility that its activism might trigger retaliation against political prisoners by the ruling authorities. 

The consequences of this approach were evident in AI’s assessment of human rights in Communist Cuba, where throughout the 1970s the organization underestimated the number of political prisoners while offering only mild criticism of the Castro regime’s persecution of political opponents. An AI annual report for 1976, for instance, noted that the “persistence of fear, real or imaginary, was primarily responsible for the early excesses in the treatment of political prisoners.” This cautiously diplomatic approach to the Castro dictatorship did not prevent AI from being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the following year. In his acceptance lecture, Mumtaz Soysal, a little-known professor from Turkey, hailed what he called AI’s mission “to spotlight the victims in every society where imprisonment results from political or religious belief …” 

A grossly disproportionate share of Amnesty International's criticism is reserved for the United States. In the 1980s AI joined leftist non-governmental organizations like the Church World Service and Americas Watch in vocally opposing the Reagan administration’s support for the Contra resistance movement against Nicaragua’s Communist dictatorship.

In recent years, AI has emerged as a vocal critic of the U.S.-led war on terror, opposing especially the American-led invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. AI's University of Oklahoma chapter endorsed a May 1, 2003 document titled "10 Reasons Environmentalists Oppose an Attack on Iraq," which was published by Environmentalists Against War.

AI has also condemned the U.S.-operated detention facilities in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. In March 2005, Amnesty International-USA's then-Executive Director William Schulz alleged that the United States had become "a leading purveyor and practitioner" of torture and urged that senior American officials -- including President Bush, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, former Central Intelligence Agency director George Tenet, and high-ranking officers at Guantanamo Bay -- face prosecution by other governments for violations of the Geneva Conventions and the U.N. Convention Against Torture. On May 25, 2005, Schulz announced that his organization "calls on foreign governments to uphold their obligations under international law by investigating all senior U.S. officials involved in the torture scandal.” "The apparent high-level architects of torture," he added, "should think twice before planning their next vacation to places like Acapulco or the French Riveria because they may find themselves under arrest as Augusto Pinochet famously did in London in 1998." Schulz’s remarks were echoed in May of 2005 by Amnesty International's Secretary General Irene Khan, who charged that “Guantanamo [Bay] has become the gulag of our times…”

In a 2002 report, AI admonished the Immigration and Naturalization Service for its policy, instituted after the 9/11 attacks, of “prolonged detention for minor immigration infractions” -- though it neglected to note that such a policy, had it been in place prior to September 11, 2001, might have exposed the three 9/11 hijackers who were in the United States illegally, including two who already had previous immigration violations). In its report, AI placed the word "terrorism" in scare quotes, suggesting that it questioned the serious nature of the phenomenon.

In AI’s calculus, the PATRIOT Act counterterrorism legislation “undermines the human rights of Americans and non-citizens, and weakens the framework for promoting human rights internationally.” In 2004 Irene Khan condemned the “security agenda promulgated by the U.S. Administration,” calling it “bankrupt of vision and bereft of principle.” Khan further claimed that America had “openly eroded human rights to win the ‘war on terror.’”

Amnesty International was a signatory to a March 17, 2003 letter exhorting members of the U.S. Congress to oppose Patriot Act II on grounds that it "contain[ed] a multitude of new and sweeping law enforcement and intelligence gathering powers … that would severely dilute, if not undermine, many basic constitutional rights." Fellow signers included the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the American Library Association, the Arab American Institute, the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Immigrant Defense Project of the New York State Defenders Association, the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, the League of United Latin American Citizens, the Mennonite Central Committee, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the National Council of La Raza, the National Immigration Law Center, the National Lawyers Guild, People for the American Way, and Women Against War.

In addition, Amnesty International has given its organizational endorsement to the Community Resolution to Protect Civil Liberties campaign, which tries to influence city councils to pass resolutions of noncompliance with the provisions of the Patriot Act. Moreover, AI endorsed the Civil Liberties Restoration Act of 2004, which was designed to roll back, in the name of protecting civil liberties, vital national-security policies that had been adopted after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Local chapters of AI were signatories to a February 20, 2002 document condemning military tribunals and the detention of immigrants apprehended in connection with post-9/11 terrorism investigations. The document charged that the U.S. government had indiscriminately “rounded up” and incarcerated without cause more than 1,500 Arabs, Muslims, and South Asians.

AI was a signatory to a November 1, 2001 document characterizing the 9/11 attacks as a legal matter to be addressed by criminal-justice procedures rather than by military retribution. Suggesting that the hijackers were motivated chiefly by a desire to draw attention to global injustices perpetrated by the United States, this document explained that similar future calamities could be averted only if America would finally begin to “promote fundamental rights around the world.”

AI is an opponent, in all cases, of the death penalty, which it regards as the “ultimate form of cruel and inhuman punishment,” and has repeatedly urged Congress to abolish it. Because the death penalty is currently a legally permitted punishment in the United States, a 2003 AI report characterized the U.S. as part of the "axis of executioners" along with China and Iran.

Another recurring target of disproportionate criticism from Amnesty International is Israel. For example, AI rushed to denounce Israel’s April 2002 military campaign in the Jenin refugee camp. A November 2002 AI report on the events -- bearing the title “Israel and the Occupied Territories, Shielded from Scrutiny: IDF Violations in Jenin and Nablus” -- accused Israel of “serious violations of international human rights or humanitarian law.” Among other criticisms, AI reproached Israel’s allegedly ongoing “occupation” of Jenin, though control of the city had in fact been ceded by Israel to the Palestinian Authority in 1996. The AI report additionally accused the Israeli Defense Forces of using Palestinian civilians as “human shields,” though it was later demonstrated that Palestinian terrorists, rather than Israeli soldiers, had exploited the camp’s residents as shields against incoming fire. In 2004 Irene Khan singled out Israel -- along with Colombia, Indonesia and Pakistan -- as a state exhibiting an “appalling human rights record.”

In the summer of 2006, AI issued a de-contextualized censure of Israel’s retaliatory military campaign against the Lebanese-based terror group Hezbollah. In an August report, AI accused Israeli forces of engaging in "war crimes" such as the “deliberate destruction” of civilian infrastructure in Southern Lebanon, omitting to note that Hezbollah terrorists had initiated the conflict and then intentionally sought refuge amid residential areas.

In May 2007, NGO Monitor released the results of its quantitative analysis of Amnesty International’s 2006 publications and alerts vis a vis human rights violations. According to the study, Israel had been the subject of 63 such Amnesty documents that year, more than any country in the Middle East except Iran. The corresponding numbers for other nations and notable entities in the region were as follows: Sudan (61 documents), Syria (51), Iraq (29), Hezbollah (20), Algeria (19), Tunisia (15), Egypt (13), Jordan (12), the Palestinian Authority (10), Libya (6), Saudi Arabia (6), and Morocco (5).

At a London ceremony in June 2009, AI honored the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, with its Media Award, in recognition of his expose of hundreds of recent extrajudicial assassinations in Kenya.

In 2009, AI participated in producing a multi-NGO publication titled Failing Gaza: No Rebuilding, No Recovery, No More Excuses. This booklet falsely accused Israel of “occupying” Gaza and subjecting the Palestinian people to an “illegal and inhumane blockade” that amounted to “collective punishment.” It also stated that Operation Cast Lead—a defensive military operation in which Israel had targeted Hamas and other Gaza-based terrorists who were firing rockets and mortars at civilian communities in southern Israel—had “left a legacy of destruction and loss” in the now “shattered society” of Gaza. Other contributors to Failing Gaza included such groups as Christian Aid, Medical Aid for Palestinians, Mercy Corps, and Oxfam International.

In 2011, AI hosted an anti-Israel conference in London titled “Complicity in Oppression: Do the Media Aid Israel?” Organized by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, this event featured an appearance by al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper editor Abdel Bari Atwan, who in 2007 had declared that he would dance “in Trafalgar Square if Iran attacked Israel,” and in 2008 had said that a terrorist attack which killed eight Israeli students at the Mercaz HaRav yeshiva in Jerusalem, “was justified.” A co-sponsor of “Complicity in Oppression" was the Middle East Monitor Online, headed by Daud Abdullah -- a signatory of the Istanbul Declaration stating that the “Islamic Nation” was obliged to “carry on jihad and Resistance” against Israel.
AI has played a major role in advancing the perception of Israel as a human-rights violator. In 2002, for instance, the organization falsely accused Israel of committing “war crimes” in Jenin. Thereafter, Amnesty’s reports formed the basis of charges that Israel was an illegal settler “entity.” Amnesty asked the Obama Administration to “immediately suspend military aid to Israel."
Amnesty has denounced Israel as an "apartheid state" with an “apartheid wall” and “apartheid roads,” which are designed to protect Israelis from Islamic terrorism.
According to YNetNews: "Amnesty’s 'soft war' against the Jews has been crucial in the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, where 3,000 NGOs convinced the United Nations to condemn Israeli 'racism.' Well-known NGOs such as Amnesty International and Save the Children attached their names to the conference. A few weeks later, the Second Intifada broke out."
YNetNews also says: "Amnesty’s played a prominent role at the UN Human Rights Council, where Israel has become a pariah state while major human rights violators enjoy exculpatory immunity, and at the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Geneva Conventions, where Israel became the first ever state to face a country-specific indictment." In 2011 Frank Johansson, the head of Finland’s branch of AI, called Israel “a scum state.”
In 2006, the year of the Second Lebanon War, AI produced more documents against Israel than on the genocide in Darfur. The organization also played a major role in depicting Mordechai Vanunu, who offered to sell Israel’s nuclear secrets to the highest bidder anywhere in the world, into a hero.
AI's condemnations of Israel also have a strong influence on the various biased reports against Israel submitted at the UN, like the discredited Goldstone Report, and in the campaigns for boycotts, divestment and sanctions against the Jewish State in European courts.

AI Report Condemns Israel

In a 49-page, November 2014 report titled “Families Under the Rubble: Israeli Attacks on Unihabited Homes,” AI accuses Israel of having committed war crimes during its 50-day military engagement with Hamas that previous summer. The report claims that the Israeli military demonstrated a “callous indifference” with regard to civilians, and states that “the onus is on Israel to provide information concerning the attacks and their intended targets.”

While the report details eight specific cases of alleged “war crimes” and violations of international law committed by Israel, it contains only one paragraph acknowledging that “Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups fired thousands of indiscriminate rockets and mortar rounds into civilian areas of Israel.” A second paragraph notes that AI “has documented and is continuing to document serious violations of international humanitarian law, including unlawful killings and injures to civilians and destruction of civilian property, both by Israel and by and Palestinian armed groups,” but clearly the report's main priority is to condemn Israel.

The AI report's primary indictment against Israel centers around the notion of “disproportionate” response -- i.e., the premise that higher rates of casualties and property damage in Gaza than in Israel serve as de facto evidence of human rights violations. Missing from that argument is the reality that Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups bore the lion’s share of the blame for the damage and casualties, because they: (a) routinely used their own civilians as human shields, and (b) used ostensibly civilian locations such as mosques and schools as weapons depots.

That reality was driven home during the conflict, when the United Nations found terrorist rockets hidden in at least three of its own schools—one of which sat adjacent to other schools used to accommodate displaced Palestinians. Moreover, Washington Post reporter William Booth observed a “group of men” moving small rockets into a mosque, even as he further noted that Shifa Hospital in Gaza City had “become a de facto headquarters for Hamas leaders, who can be seen in the hallways and offices.” Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) explained the dual motivation for such genuine callousness. “Hamas chooses to use these protected areas for military purposes in order to shield itself from IDF strikes,” they said at the time. “And to draw international condemnation of Israel if the IDF is forced to respond.”

In a section of the report entitled “Precautions and ‘Human Shields,’” AI explains that warring parties have “an obligation to protect civilians and civilian objects under their control against the effects of an attack by the adversary,” and that those adversaries must, to the extent feasible, “avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas.” The report uses a Red Cross definition of feasibility, indicating that “no one can be required to do the impossible,” and that a party to the conflict “cannot be expected to arrange its armed forces and installations in such a way as to make them conspicuous to the benefit of the adversary.” That statement seems to imply that AI is actually endorsing the use of human shields as a means of making military targets “less feasible” to attack. AI doubles down on this notion, insisting, “the fact that Palestinian fighters are located within civilian areas does not in any way negate Israel’s obligations to those citizens…”

Palestinian obligations to their own citizens, or the reality that they do in fact use them for human shields, in never even mentioned. Furthermore, AI dismisses as insufficient Israel’s unprecedented effort to minimize civilian casualties by dropping pamphlets, making phone calls, etc. to warn Palestinian civilians (and by extension the terrorists) of impending attacks.

At the end of the report, AI issues a series of recommendations for both sides and other states. The only recommendation for the Palestinians is that they should accept the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction over crimes committed since 2002, and accede to the “Rome Statute” of that Court, which has established four international crimes, defined as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression.

Meanwhile, the report likewise recommends that Israel: (a) accept the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction and accede to the Rome Statute; (b) grant AI access to Gaza; (c) revise its military doctrines and tactics; and (d) provide reparations to all victims of “serious violations of international law, including victims whose homes and properties were unlawfully destroyed or damaged during Operation Protective Edge.”

There is tremendous irony attached to the last recommendation. It was Israel, bowing to pressure from the international community following Israel’s and Egypt’s closure of its borders with Gaza, that supplied the territory with most of the cement used to build a series of terror tunnels with exits located in the Jewish State. Eighteen of the tunnels discovered by Israel used more than 800,000 tons of concrete, an amount more than enough to construct eight skyscrapers as big as Dubai’s Burj Khalifa, the world’s tallest. Egypt discovered and destroyed an additional 1,370 tunnels under its border with the Gaza Strip.

The AI report also recommends that all other nations stop shipping arms, munitions, weapons and military equipment to Israel until it is held accountable for its previous humanitarian violations, and mechanisms are put it placed to prevent future ones. There is no mention whatsoever of ongoing Iranian efforts to supply Hamas with weapons, or of the Syrian-made rockets that had boosted Hamas’s missile capability from a range of three or four miles, to approximately 70 miles.

Additional Information

The current Executive Director of Amnesty International is Larry Cox, who succeeded William Schulz in January 2006.

AI has received funding from dozens of foundations, including Agape Foundation, the Bank of America Foundation, the Columbia Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, the JEHT Foundation, the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Minneapolis Foundation, the the Open Society Institute, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Stewart R. Mott Charitable Trust, the Vanguard Public Foundation, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

A small portion of this profile is adapted, with permission, from NGO Monitor.



Since Feb 14, 2005 --Hits: 61,630,061 --Visitors: 7,024,052

Copyright 2003-2015 : DiscoverTheNetworks.org